131
131
Oct 13, 2012
10/12
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 131
favorite 0
quote 0
it is a state law requirement. in many instances we also have pharmacy technicians who are engaged in this and certainly the level of training and expertise of that staff is key to this. and a.s.h.p. is another organization where we're looking that technicians should be certified at the state level. and again, i think you're right, it's really key that the personnel who are involved in these activities are appropriately trained to provide this care so that's one of the reasons that we as an organization are very supportive of appropriate training of technicians as well as pharmacists. host: is compounding done at your cv s and walgreens, those type of facilities as well? guest: yes but much lower risk products. and generally you're not seeing compounding of sterile products. it's products associated with higher risks you don't see in that setting. host: how many specific compounding pharmacies are there in the u.s.? guest: i think that number is groge. the 7500 you just mention sd probably a good estimate but we've
it is a state law requirement. in many instances we also have pharmacy technicians who are engaged in this and certainly the level of training and expertise of that staff is key to this. and a.s.h.p. is another organization where we're looking that technicians should be certified at the state level. and again, i think you're right, it's really key that the personnel who are involved in these activities are appropriately trained to provide this care so that's one of the reasons that we as an...
148
148
Oct 6, 2012
10/12
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 148
favorite 0
quote 0
there are different laws and they are divided up into strict laws and non-strict laws. with strict laws, you have to have either a photo i.d. or in non-frodo id in order to cast a ballot. -- or a non-photo id in order to cast a ballot. or you have to produce it within the next few days after voting. with non-trip, you do not have this kind of strict requirements. a poll worker that knows you can guard for you. there are different criteria in place in order to be able to vote if you do not have the idps -- the id. basically, the argument is that it prevents a voter fraud and voter identity theft. host: from the "washington post" with strict letter of the laws, kan., a florida and georgia. ... kansas, tennessee and georgia. most states are covered by non- photo id and most aren't requiring identification laws. guest: before the 2008 election, the laws were not as stringent than they were not as numerous. after the 2008 election, there seemed to be a wave of republican-controlled state legislatures pushing forth some of these laws. it seems to have evolved, in fact, into a
there are different laws and they are divided up into strict laws and non-strict laws. with strict laws, you have to have either a photo i.d. or in non-frodo id in order to cast a ballot. -- or a non-photo id in order to cast a ballot. or you have to produce it within the next few days after voting. with non-trip, you do not have this kind of strict requirements. a poll worker that knows you can guard for you. there are different criteria in place in order to be able to vote if you do not have...
179
179
Oct 10, 2012
10/12
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 179
favorite 0
quote 0
how does she know that she was the person in that particular law school? i continue to hear these arguments that say -- i think one of the discussions that took place, they were bumped because so-called blacks took their place and were unqualified. that there are other components for law schools, not just grades, but other things that are considered. consideration of all that. you know, these affirmative action things came out of -- when blacks applied to these schools, it was understood that if you were black, you would not be admitted because you were black. no blacks. there is a history of discrimination in these particular programs. i find it difficult to believe that this person can legitimately say that they were bumped because she was white. how do you know that? host: robert, it sounds like you will be interested in listening to the oral arguments. the audio will be released friday after 1:00 p.m., covered on c-span.org, in case you want to hear what sort of questions the justices asked of those arguing this case, and then to get some idea of how t
how does she know that she was the person in that particular law school? i continue to hear these arguments that say -- i think one of the discussions that took place, they were bumped because so-called blacks took their place and were unqualified. that there are other components for law schools, not just grades, but other things that are considered. consideration of all that. you know, these affirmative action things came out of -- when blacks applied to these schools, it was understood that...
245
245
Oct 8, 2012
10/12
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 245
favorite 0
quote 1
at what point is there a law of diminishing returns? guest: if your campaign has the money, you cannot go quiet. i think he would be at a disadvantage, if they go dark. more importantly, to answer the question, the vote in ohio is today, this week. these candidates are doing everything that they can, restructuring to some degree. mitt romney and the president talking directly to the camera, making their appeal. i think that dan is right. this is one of five states in the country where, commercial after commercial, candidates have a presence. this is key to their strategy. host: coming after just one debate, there are two more scheduled. is it a good idea to have early voting when this race could change for the president or for mitt romney? guest: personally, i think it is a good idea to have early voting. it is important to provide that for the convenience of the voters. the jury is still out to the extent as to if early voting increases turned out, but what we have seen across the country in recent decades and recent years is a sharp u
at what point is there a law of diminishing returns? guest: if your campaign has the money, you cannot go quiet. i think he would be at a disadvantage, if they go dark. more importantly, to answer the question, the vote in ohio is today, this week. these candidates are doing everything that they can, restructuring to some degree. mitt romney and the president talking directly to the camera, making their appeal. i think that dan is right. this is one of five states in the country where,...
338
338
Oct 7, 2012
10/12
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 338
favorite 0
quote 1
in addition to that, what president put that into law? why not, if it was not for the benefit of the constituents? guest: first of all, the capital gains preference dates back throughout the entire history of the income tax. there were a couple of years in the late 1980's where they were taxed. as far as the history of income tax, and for capital gains on corporate stocks, the evidence is compelling that this is in come at the corporate level. to tax it again at the individual level, it puts a penalty and corporations for issuing stock instead of debt. it would be a mistake to keep it in place. i think that the same point applies to dividends as well. capital gains also apply to land. one point to keep in mind there is that you cannot push the rating too high. people become reluctant to sell their assets. you are not taxed until the asset is sold. there is an upper limit to how far you can push it. but you could still hit 14% with more revenue. host: -- guest: some have indicated that the rate is around 28%, where would not affect what pe
in addition to that, what president put that into law? why not, if it was not for the benefit of the constituents? guest: first of all, the capital gains preference dates back throughout the entire history of the income tax. there were a couple of years in the late 1980's where they were taxed. as far as the history of income tax, and for capital gains on corporate stocks, the evidence is compelling that this is in come at the corporate level. to tax it again at the individual level, it puts a...
183
183
Oct 11, 2012
10/12
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 183
favorite 0
quote 0
there are a laws in place that ensure these military volt are -- votes are counted. i have confidence that they will be counted. host: michael in stamford, connecticut, independent caller, you're on the air. caller: good morning. i want to talk about the recovery and whoever gets elected are going to have to start the recovery getting better. it sort of like everybody agrees that recovery is going on but it's not good enough. but we're recovering. what are we recovering from? it seems like we're recovering from the republicans and tagging over and not doing anything or getting in the way of everything. i think if we reelect more republicans, it will be like a relapse and we will be right back in the same old boat. they run around like crazy fret, drunken students these republicans. guest: listen, we definitely need to create jobs, grow the economy. the fact is this president has failed at that. there's a reason why they put the republicans in the house. what we've been able to do is stem the spending that's been happening under the democrats. we've started that job o
there are a laws in place that ensure these military volt are -- votes are counted. i have confidence that they will be counted. host: michael in stamford, connecticut, independent caller, you're on the air. caller: good morning. i want to talk about the recovery and whoever gets elected are going to have to start the recovery getting better. it sort of like everybody agrees that recovery is going on but it's not good enough. but we're recovering. what are we recovering from? it seems like...
207
207
Oct 14, 2012
10/12
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 207
favorite 0
quote 0
arizona tries to enforce their immigration laws and the u.s. government and is up suing them because of it. i think it's obvious that obama opposes any immigration laws and it helps the democratic party. this gentleman makes a good case for that. as for the traditional values, obama and his ilk believe they are against basically what i grew up with over the years. i think the lady was correct. thank you. host: leonard steinhorn, dot let's be clear about what you're talking about in this headline. "you are not a citizen, but you still might help the election." are you talking about non- citizens casting votes? guest: election fraud is a non- issue. this is not something that is relevant. all of the stat's going after election fraud in many ways, they're doing that to suppress the vote of certain people they do not one voting. one big irony is florida, going through a statewide persia, -- purge, they're benefiting from having non-citizens in their state. it's ironic that they are benefiting from them when they're trying to encourage -- remove the
arizona tries to enforce their immigration laws and the u.s. government and is up suing them because of it. i think it's obvious that obama opposes any immigration laws and it helps the democratic party. this gentleman makes a good case for that. as for the traditional values, obama and his ilk believe they are against basically what i grew up with over the years. i think the lady was correct. thank you. host: leonard steinhorn, dot let's be clear about what you're talking about in this...